Thursday, 18 February 2010
Use BOTH Lanes? Repairing Worn out Carriageway!
Now, I would have though that using just one lane would have been better. But keen to oblige I straddled both lanes with my van. Try as I might, I couldn't keep both lanes fully occupied though, and drivers kept sneaking down the inside, or overtaking me. Clearly they didn't read or understand the sign, as they were intent on using just one lane. I can't see how it helps relieve congestion myself. I mean if you did use just one lane, then other traffic could use the other and then you'd get twice as much traffic into the City so much quicker. Maybe that is the point. By asking us to straddle both lanes, the volume of traffic entering the city is halved, so congestion within the City Centre is reduced. And maybe the people in the queue get fed up of waiting and go home instead.
In an attempt to follow the directions on the sign I started weaving between the two lanes - this had the effect not only of reducing congestion, but also of slowing the traffic down, as no-one could overtake me any more. A sort of mobile traffic calming scheme, although after a while I did start to feel seasick. And then I attracted the attention of a nice young man in a Volvo with a fancy paint job. And Disco lights.
He explained to me, after the breathalyser test that the sign actually meant I could use EITHER lane, not both. I can only assume that the sign maker had run out of E, I and R but had BO in abundance. Either (or is that Both) that or he had no grasp of basic English. Funny the difference a word can make.
Another Road Sign I liked in the roadworks was one that said "Repairing worn out carriageway." Nothing like laying the guilt back on the motorist is there? We've worn it out, so they've had to come out and mend it. Isn't that what we pay you to do? Don't lay the guilt back on us. And if you are going to give explanations for the roadworks then let's see some real honesty. "Repairing shoddy workmanship." perhaps, or "Removing substandard materials and replacing them with the stuff we should have used in the first place."
I also like the sign that reads "Lane closed for the safety of workforce" and it's cousin, "Speed limit for workforce safety" These are placed in the miles of cones which precede any actual roadworks, and the irony is the workforce they refer to is NEVER EVER present. In fact the only thing they protect is the lanes of parked vehicles and equipment which is not in use. The honest version of the sign would actually read "Lane closed for parking of workforce vehicles." Why can't they park their cars at the services or in a lay by and then walk or be bussed to the works area? They don't all need their private cars there surely?
For this reason Sign writers and Road workers are now consigned to Room 101.
Monday, 1 February 2010
Weight loss
So I have renewed my healthy eating campaign and using my gym more frequently - every other day in fact. I will also resume my cycling to work just as soon as it stops snowing and freezing - there are limits dontcha know. m Meanwhile I am air walking, cycling and using the multigym and even the hated rowing machine. I might even start swimming once a week too.
Already I have been for a run - a quick one miler, but you have to start small and build up. Thusrday is Emmas Dance night, and because it's only 45 minutes it means if I drop her off then drive home there isn't really time to do anything before it;'s time to head back and pick her up again. Normally I've sat in the car in the car park and read a book. Not any more. Now I have a run round the village - and then sit in the car and read a book. But the plan is to run a little further each week, and read a little less.
And the practical upshot of all this? I've lost 5 pounds in 14 days. Call it 15 days, that's a pound every three days. Which means that by March 2017 I will have disappeared altogether!
I'll be happy to get down to 15 stone, but if I can reach a trim 14 I'll be delighted. Not so long back I was tipping 16 stone , so it's going well. And I'm already feeling the benefits in both health and wealth. Pack up lunches instead of take aways. No drastic diets, no stupid mega workouts, just a gentle change in lifestyle.
Tuesday, 12 January 2010
A stiff Chinky
With the new frame built up and a dash of paint it was time to make the battery cover. Plywood was chosen for a few reasons - it is a good insulator so won't short out the tops of the batteries if accidental contact is made, it looks okay, it's cheap, it's easy to work with and I had a bit lying around in the garage. This is a budget project remember, so anything that can be used will be used. Including the old suitcase handle I found in the shed, which makes removal of the cover much easier than levering it out with a screwdriver each time access to he batteries is needed.
The seat refits nicely over the frame and only an inch higher than before, only the ill fitting carpet giving the game away that anything might be lurking under there. A new carpet will be fitted at some point once the car is on the road again.
The broken rear light has now got my attention and has been removed with 2 new replacements on the way courtesy of E Bay £4 each plus postage. These are the newer spec with the white(grey?) style indicator lenses. Looking at the old lamp I have removed I think it will be possible to replace the bulbs with LED bulbs to save the 12Volt accessory battery a little, although the indicators will need a resistor in place so they still flash at the right rate.
I'm also hoping the SAAB sourced vacuum pump will arrive tomorrow, so I can get on with the brakes.
Wednesday, 6 January 2010
Chinky powered up
With the charger clamped down and a new control knob fiitted it will just need some calibration marks to make it easily useable in future. 66 volts is okay for the 60 volt battery array present at tghe moment, but tommorow may see the additiona of another battery , so that'll take us to 72 volts in the array and probably around 78 to 80 volts from the charger output to charge them. The multimeter shown is not a permeneant underbonnet fixture, it is just there for calibration and testing purposes.
Chinky still lists badly to the left with his flat and bald tyres on that side, so I may be loking to get a couple of part worn tyres to make him sit upright again, or if money allows, maybe we'll get four brand new ones!
Saturday, 12 December 2009
Peak of perfection.
Short order was made of the motorway leg of the journey, then a cut through the pre-rush hour metropolis that is Harrogate saw us onto the A59 and in search of breakfast of the bacon and sausage sandwich variety.
We had on the previous event stopped at a roadside lay by cafe which has spectacular views of the Dales near Skipton, and the experience was only somewhat marred by the slightly eccentric proprietor showing off various Air Ambulance related regalia in the misguided but very enthusiastic belief that we were in some way remotely interested. On that occasion we had dropped coins in his tin and beat a hasty retreat. Well it is a very worthy cause.
During the summer I had passed the cafe several times and found it closed, so finding it open we assumed it was perhaps under new ownership. Foolishly we stopped and entered.
Arriving at our overnight base at Halton Gill the accommodation looked impressive - from outside. unfortunately due to a hiccup we couldn't get in, the caretaker was supposed to meet us or leave it unlocked for our arrival but did neither. No phone signal meant we couldn't even ring the owner to get the key code for the back door. So it was down to Horton, where we could get a signal and sort it out from there, then booted and suited straight up Pen-Y-Ghent. In the summer I tackled the ascent the long way up short way down. This time it was the reverse, a long steepish drag up then that last climb up the sheer slope for lunch at the top followed by the long trek down the slope to Horton again.
Ready for liquid refreshment we headed to the Golden Lion scene of our 2008 visit but found it disappointingly closed. The name of the pub at the other end of Horton escapes me, but did a very nice pint of something warm and wet. A humorous interlude provided by an unwitting local and proliferated by PK venting his spleen on the absurdity of the comment sent Selby into uncontrollable giggles, each succinct barb coming with such perfect comedic timing that Dave very nearly asphyxiated, unable to regain breathing control.
The cause of such merriment? "Afternoon lads. It's a nice day. It's not raining."
The clouldless sky gave unprecedented views of the milky way and several shooting stars as we slip slided on the black ice covered tarmac back to the bunkhouse. Then the night slipped away with a few more beers and several games of pool. Most enjoyable. Except it was about then that PK's bowels began to let loose a series of violent and foul expulsions, rating 7.2 on the Richter scale and with the sulphuric fury of Beelzebub's bathwater. This was to go on all through the night, relegating cows into second place as the worlds leading CO2 producers.
Settling down to bed PK bagged what he supposed to be the best top bunk in the house, only to find that when the lights went out he was swathed in the bright green luminence of the emergency light, hardly conducive to restful sleep. All other options being taken he retired to the lower bunk.
Friday morning saw three of the four in the group being rudely awakened by some bastard clanging a saucepan with a spoon in the style of the old cowboy films. I was not one of the three so I guess that makes me the bastard. Dave came awake so quickly that he nearly put his head through the ceiling, but Mike was strangely unaffected, remaining as motionless as he had all night, the only one never to have moved in any way, the rest of us creaked and groaned all night on the squeaky but surprisingly comfortable metal sprung bunks. Perhaps it's his miltary background and he doesn't move so as not to give his position away.
The saucepan was put to good use in preparing a full English before we packed up and moved on to West View, another bunkhouse the other side of the Peaks near Ingleton ready for day two of the challenge. Although lacking in the Sauna and pool table areas this was a much smaller and more homely venue and had a TV with Freeview. Bonus!
Left: Martin in "Buzz Lightyear" pose at the Ribblehead Viaduct.
Pen-Y-Ghent has of course been discussed in detail on the blog before. It is, as is well documented, an evil brooding bastard. It is however, honest and up front about it. Whernside on the other hand is a devious, sneaky bastard. It sits there looking all inncoent hiding more than it's fair share of uphilliness and just pretending to be pretty. Don't be fooled by it. I'd rather have done Pen-Y-Ghent again than Whernside. It has a long long climb, and with the wintery conditions it was as slippery as a cabinet minister covered in somethign slippery, standing on a slippery thing, covered in something slippery. Regardless, we eventualy made the top without mishap, if of course you exclude PK's extremely entertaining dance moves to avoid falling over. Such effort went into his many arm and leg movements that falling over would have involved less risk of injury in the long run, but he did maintain an upright position, even if he lacked some poise and dignity at that precise moment.
Despite the cool temperatures the sun was shining brightly promting Dave of Selby to strip off his lower legs and reveal his whiter bits to the sunlight. He was still in shorts when we stopped at the top to break for lunch. The rest of us were also down to one layer, but the breif lunchstop saw my body temperature plummet, and even with all five layers restored it took a while to get back the warmth I'd lost.
After a much deserved pint Mike had to depart back to Hull, unable to get the early shift off work the next day, but the remainder of the team adjourned to West View, the bunkhouse just outside of Ingleton and only a 1/2 mile stroll from the Marton Arms.
Wednesday, 9 December 2009
Feeling Peaky
Tuesday, 8 December 2009
Global warming - again.
Last time I wrote about it I think I sort of suggested that we nuke China, on the grounds that humans exhale CO2, and the increase in CO2 in the last century is roughly equivalent to the increase in the popoulation of China, therefore logically eradicating China eradicates global warming. I think I may also have relented slightly, suggesting that not all Chinamen are deserving of sucgh a fate, and that perhaps we could nuke Iraq instead.
Anyway, my point is that CO2 global warming is bollocks, the idea that cars and factories are choking the planet is ridiculous. It's natural weather patterns that are causing it, hence the last ice age and the gradual warming since. How else do you explain the glorious summer of 1939? The battle of Britain saw some of the warmest weather this century.
This week comes the announcement that Methane gas is a bigger cause of global warming than CO2. The majority of Methane of course is produced by cows. Suprisingly the Government has not introduced a cow tax, nor has it launched a media campaign to reduce the use of cows, nor have they got tough on cows or the causes of cows.
Last night on The One Show some wishy washy vegetarian suggested that global warming would be redued if we all stopped eating meat. In theory that sounds fine, less people eating cows, equals less cows, equals less Methane. But hang on, what do vegetarians eat, once they have worried all the lettuces and cabbages? That's right, they eat cheese and yoghurt. And they drink milk because they are too wimpy to consider beer as an alternative. Cheese, yoghurt and milk come from cows!
When you think about it cows are probably quite the most ecological animal on the planet. The give milk, which can make cream, or cheese, youghurt or whey, they can be made into steaks or burgers, and their skins are made into leather. And thier bones can probably be boiled down to make glue or something. Even their tails go into soup. The idea of recuding the number of something so useful is preposterous.
So, and here is my serious suggestion, if we are so concerned about the Methane these cows are producing, and the CO2 produced by cars, why can't we compromise? A car will run happily on Liquid Petroleum Gas, which is only a small step away from Metahane Gas. Surely science can up with a way of strapping a cow to every car to make it Methane neutral, CO2 Neutral and still able to provide burgers, steak, cheese, eggs, milk, cream, leather shoes, and superglue prior to it being scrapped for a new Mondeo under the Governments scrappage scheme?
